TRANSMISSION
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICES LITIGATION
Back to Top |
ERG was
recently retained by a large western U.S. mining concern to
provide litigation support and expert testimony in state
public service commission and federal district court cases
concerning issues related to financial losses suffered by the
mine resulting from the supplying investor-owned utility’s
electric transmission operation and maintenance practices,
power quality issues and reliability issues.
ERG was
recently retained by a large western U.S. mining concern to provide
litigation support and expert testimony in state public service
commission and federal district court cases concerning issues
related to financial losses suffered by the mine resulting from
the supplying investor-owned utility’s electric transmission
operation and maintenance practices, power quality issues and
reliability issues.
ERG
was recently retained by a major international steel producer
to investigate the existence of significant power
quality issues being alleged by the electric utility serving
the mill. These issues resulted from the catastrophic failure
of the mill’s static var system(SVC). ERG is analyzing
the extent to which the mill is producing harmonic voltages and
currents with reduced SVC operation, in comparison to allowable
limits under applicable U.S. and international standards. In
addition, ERG is analyzing the potential for problems which could
occur at the utility’s nearby generating station, as a
result of harmonic distortion reflected into the transmission
system. ERG anticipates sponsoring expert testimony in a proceeding
at the state public utilities commission regarding a proposed
special tariff which was recently filed for service to the mill.
AVISTA CORPORATION, AVISTA ENERGY, INC. PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ENRON POWER MARKETING, INC. FERC Docket No.E02-115-000
Back to Top |
ERG has been providing consulting support to the City of Tacoma,
Washington, as an intervener in
this docket, which was initiated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (“FERC”) to investigate whether the respondents
engaged in any electricity trading practices designed to manipulate
the western electric market in 2000 - 2001. Expert testimony
was sponsored by ERG Executive Consultant Philip Movish on behalf
of Tacoma which, amongst other things, alleged that Avista traders
had knowledge of their participation in improper trading activities.
On June 25, 2005,
FERC Chief Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner, issued an
ORDER OF CHIEF JUDGE DENYING REQUEST TO CERTIFY
CONTESTED SETTLEMENT, REINSTATE HEARING PROCEDURES, AND RULING
ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY. Specifically, the Chief Judge,
after a thorough review of the evidence in the docket concurred
that “The examples set forth in Mr. Movish’s affidavit
presents a clear demonstration on genuine unresolved issues of
material fact. The examples set forth by Mr. Movish tend to indicate
that Avista Utilities and Avista Energy traders understood and
knew what they were doing.”
ERG continues to provide consulting and expert testimony support
to Tacoma in this and other ongoing regulatory proceedings before
the FERC which are investigating Enron trading strategies and
manipulation of the western electric market in 2000 - 2001.
ERG was
recently retained by a major international
bank to perform appraisals and site inspections of two Central
American power plant expansion projects. The two projects,
which the bank was considering, involved the installation
of additional low speed diesel engine generating units and
associated auxiliary equipment at two existing sites in Northeastern
and Southwestern Honduras.
ERG was
retained to perform physical inspections of the project equipment
and construction sites; conduct due diligence interviews with
project development, construction, and plant operating staff;
review project design documents and contracts; review proposed
preventative maintenance programs; and perform Fair Market
Value and Distress Value appraisals of the two projects.
When
completed, these units will deliver power under contract to
Empresa Nacional de Energia Electrica ("ENEE") the national
electric utility. The two installations consist of thirteen
units totaling approximately 138 MW of capacity. Due to the
asset-based structure of the financing, the bank was concerned
regarding the allocation and use of common facilities and the
ability of the local operations and maintenance staff to keep
the equipment in good operating condition.
ERG's
assessments enabled the bank to address its concerns in support
of proceeding with the time sensitive asset-based financing
of both projects. In addition, while on-site, ERG personnel
provided advice and counsel
to project staff regarding further development of the projects
and future operation and maintenance considerations.
While
in Honduras for this engagement, ERG staff encountered
the extensive devastation caused by Hurricane Mitch in October
1998. Though, recovery efforts are well underway, there is
still much more work needed to reestablish the country's infrastructure.
When completed, the power plants reviewed by ERG will
be major contributors toward the economic recovery of Honduras.
ERG
recently completed a power supply study performed for a joint
action agency consisting of 18 municipal utilities located
in the Southeastern U.S. The study assessed the viability of
repowering aging gas-fired conventional boilers at 6 municipal
power facilities, and compared potential combined-cycle repowering
opportunities, with new greenfield power plant development,
and merchant power offers.
Seventeen units
at six sites were identified as candidates for repowering; the
units ranged in size from a low of 5 MW to a high of 41 MW, and
in age from 27 years to 40 years. As part of the analysis, ERG
staff visited and reviewed the selected facilities, assessed
the candidate equipment, and developed estimated cost and performance
parameters for each of the repowering options. In addition
to assessing the technical feasibility of the repowering options,
and in order to compare the repowering opportunities with competing
alternatives, ERG performed a system wide economic analysis.
The analysis involved forecasting member utilities loads and
fuel prices, and forecasting the availability of, and prices
for wholesale market power. As part of the study, the utilities=
existing generating system was modeled for comparison to potential
supply-side options. Total production costs for the system were
developed and compared under various operating and capacity expansion
scenarios through the year 2020.
Study results
are being used by the agency in support of its future supply
decision making in a time where the market is fraught with regulatory
and fuel price uncertainty and hampered by the financial downgrading
of large power producers as a result of the collapse of Enron
and the deregulated energy market debacle in California.
NATIVE
AMERICAN WATER PRODUCTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
Back
to Top |
ERG
recently completed a feasibility study which investigated the
development of a potable water supply system for a group of Native
American clients located in the Southwestern U.S. ERG’s
study was accomplished to investigate the following: (i) alternative
engineering designs for water production, storage and distribution
facilities; (ii) project cost estimation, (iii) an assessment
of projected rates of return on investment; (iv) alternative
project financing methods and potential sources of capital necessary
to fund the project; (v) discounted cash flow financial modeling,
and (vi) development of a proposed contractual agreement between
the parties for development of the project.
Several significant
issues facing water supply systems in dry and arid areas of the
country, such as scarcity of water sources, rapid growth associated
with increase in population, and other unique local characteristics
were considered in ERG’s analyses.
ERG provided
valuable expertise in performing an assessment of project financing
options. Although cash investment was possible, ERG determined
that project funding via issuance of the revenue bonds would
benefit the project, given the relative risks of developing a
new water production system, and in support of maintaining the
project’s revenue stability. ERG prepared twelve project
development and funding scenarios for several wholesale and retail
system alternatives, which considered alternative system sizing,
water source availability, variable municipal bond yields, and
the prospect of potential system growth. ERG was also intimately
involved in developing a draft contractual agreement between
the participants in the project.
Based upon
ERG’s study results, preliminary project development activities
have commenced.
DEVELOPMENT
OF ALTERNATIVE PURCHASE GAS ADJUSTMENT CLAUSE MECHANISMS
Back
to Top |
In
recent years, prices in U.S. natural gas markets have shown significant
volatility which have resulted in great fluctuations in monthly
natural gas bills of retail distribution system customers. ERG
was recently retained by a Southeastern Retail Regulatory Commission
to investigate the feasibility of alternative purchase gas adjustment
mechanism designs for utilities in their jurisdiction. ERG investigated
adjustment methodologies which are commonly in use around the
country to determine if any one mechanism above others is preferred
by regulators to dampen the affect of natural gas price volatility
to retail end-use customers. As part of this engagement, ERG
reviewed what factors directly or indirectly affected the price
of natural gas. Such factors included but were not limited to:
(i) weather and end-user consumption patterns; (ii) gas procurement
procedures and resulting gas supply contract structures; (iii)
use of financial hedging, futures, swaps, and options; (iv) gas
storage availability/utilization; (v) pipeline capacity conditions;
and (vi) natural gas costs and demand projections.
In order to
meet the regulator’s objective of minimizing the impact
of volatile natural gas prices on monthly retail natural gas
bills, ERG proposed that a twelve-month rolling average methodology,
as an alternative to the utilities existing purchased gas adjustment
clauses be taken into consideration. In addition, ERG also recommended
utilities should investigate ways to minimize their exposure
to extreme natural gas price fluctuations by segmenting portions
of their gas supply portfolio with spot market purchases, short/long
term contracts, hedging instruments and more efficient operation
of available gas storage services.
ERG continues
to monitor the effect of its recommendations upon monthly natural
gas bills on behalf of the regulator.

About
Us Practice Areas Career
Opportunities Contact Us
Project Highlights Related
Links News
Back to Main
All Contents Copyright © 2001-2003
, Energy & Resource Consulting Group, LLC
Site Created by Net Dot Stuff,
All Rights Reserved |
|